To Top

NJ Sportsbooks Could Gain Edge Regardless of Prediction Market Ruling

A court ruling on prediction markets could reshape NJ gambling, but one analyst says sportsbooks stand to benefit no matter the outcome
Any ruling on prediction markets could help regulated sportsbooks in NJ.
Photo by NMK-Studio/Shutterstock
Corey Sharp Avatar
2 mins read
Share Share
Copy link Share on X Share on Facebook Share on Reddit Share via Email

Prediction markets have sparked controversy in New Jersey that is hurting the regulated sports betting industry, a Jefferies Equity Research analyst believes. A decision, one way or the other, is going to benefit operators.

Prediction markets have been prevalent in New Jersey since the Super Bowl. However, operators such as Kalshi and Robinhood are not subject to the NJ Division of Gaming Enforcement. They are regulated under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

Kalshi won a preliminary injunction in April to continue operations after the DGE issued a cease-and-desist letter.

Any decision is better than no decision

The DGE believes that prediction markets should be under the same regulation requirements as online sportsbooks in New Jersey, which is why the state appealed the preliminary injunction ruling.

The decision remains up in the air, as of now.

Jefferies Equity Research analyst David Katz said that any decision the court rules would help sports betting operators. Complete iGaming explained Katz’s stance:

“A level playing field, he explained, favored incumbent sports betting providers over ‘disruptors’ such as Kalshi.

“The former has the infrastructure, as well as the scale of operation, needed to prevail, whether in customer cultivation, product development, or efficiency of marketing.”

The uncertainty prediction markets continue to have puts the regulated market in limbo.

Where the court is leaning

A ruling has not been set on prediction markets, and it could go either way at this point. The markets have prevailed to this point.

Katz does feel the courts are leaning towards Kalshi, since the CFTC is federally regulated, which supersedes state law. Despite favoring Kalshi, changes in market offerings could follow:

“The court appeared sympathetic to its argument that the law as written indicates that sports events could be considered commercially consequential and therefore swaps.

“However, commentary also suggests the court could put significant guardrails around what constitutes a swap, therefore limiting the scope of Kalshi’s offerings, notably on player props.”

About the Author
VIEW ALL POSTS
Corey Sharp

Lead Writer

Corey Sharp joined Catena Media in 2022 and is the go-to expert for New Jersey gambling. Born and raised in Philadelphia, PA, he previously worked for the Philadelphia Inquirer and NBC Sports Philadelphia as a sports journalist and content producer. In Corey’s role as Lead Writer for PlayNJ, he works alongside a talented team of expert journalists and analysts to bring you the most comprehensive and accurate coverage of gambling news in New Jersey. Corey’s contacts around the industry makes him a trusted source. Corey produces daily stories and features about the gambling space. Corey graduated from Holy Family University in Philadelphia with a bachelor’s degree in sports management.

VIEW ALL POSTS